oxeo0/blog-contributions
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of http://git.nowherejezfoltodf4jiyl6r56jnzintap5vyjlia7fkirfsnfizflqd.onion/nihilist/blog-contributions.git synced 2025-07-02 11:56:40 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

new tutorial: why the blog

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
nihilist 2025-04-30 11:23:16 +02:00
parent 68196c4d47
commit a5eeb2ca14
33 changed files with 1025 additions and 37 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
opsec/criticism/index.html
View file

@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger t
<p><b>This is the minimum for me to consider your feedback and do something about it.</b> However if you want to bring some extra quality to your criticism, you can do the following:</p>
<p><b><u>- Level 5:</u></b> (Refutation)</b> You can first quote what i wrote (but i know what i wrote so you can simply link to the tutorial directly and i'll immediately know the context of what you're talking about), and then explain exactly why it's not correct. <b>Ideally if you're basing your criticism on external sources, also post links to those resources that explain further what you're talking about,</b> so that i get the full picture: </p>
<img src="3.png" class="imgRz">
<p><b><u>- Level 6:</u></b> (Refuting the central point)</b> If you actually care about me improving my tutorials, cut out all the bullshit you see from level 0 to level 3 and <b>just stick to refuting what i wrote, explicitely.</b> Whether it be the reasoning behind the tutorial, the explanations, the showcased setups, or the purpose of any of the tutorials. <b>However, for every criticism that you make, also let me know how you think the blogpost could be improved.</b> Tell me how you'd improve the tutorial if you think the solution i presented is not good enough (or not simple enough) like in the example above.</p>
<p><b><u>- Level 6:</u></b> (Refuting the central point)</b> If you actually care about me improving my tutorials, cut out all the bullshit you see from level 0 to level 3 and <b>just stick to refuting what i wrote, explicitely.</b> wheter it be the reasoning behind the tutorial, the explanations, the showcased setups, or the purpose of any of the tutorials. <b>However, for every criticism that you make, also let me know how you think the blogpost could be improved.</b> Tell me how you'd improve the tutorial if you think the solution i presented is not good enough (or not simple enough) like in the example above.</p>
<p>This is the whole premise behind Truth seeking, I strive to have the most correct perception of the subject, but in the end that's my perception. If we combine multiple correct perceptions of the same topic, we are getting that much closer to the truth than we previously were, now that we have a wider, clearer perception of what we're talking about.</p>
<p>And that's it! You now know how to send valid criticism, <b>and you now know how to do it like an adult</b>. By doing so you can effectively contribute to the overall project by helping us continuously improving our blogposts.</p>