From fdf85877f9117ea3b113287c820e85b610a65f2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:58:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update servers/anonsensitive/index.html --- servers/anonsensitive/index.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/servers/anonsensitive/index.html b/servers/anonsensitive/index.html index 74a7911..0de7dd6 100644 --- a/servers/anonsensitive/index.html +++ b/servers/anonsensitive/index.html @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@

Since Bob has no other choice but to comply when the adversary forces him to unlock his hard drives, and since e didn’t implement Deniable Encryption, he has to show all the incriminating evidence, and therefore he can no longer deny implications with the sensitive activity.

Bob’s setup, although suitable for Anonymous Use, is not suitable for Sensitive Use due to the lack of Deniable Encryption

-

For instance, if Bob had implemented VeraCrypt’s deniable encryption to store the sensitive data, he could’ve given password A to open the decoy volume for the adversary, and could’ve claimed that there was no hidden volume. The adversary wouldn have no way to prove otherwise.

+

For instance, if Bob had implemented VeraCrypt’s deniable encryption to store the sensitive data, he could’ve given password A to open the decoy volume for the adversary, and could’ve claimed that there was no hidden volume. The adversary would have no way to prove otherwise.