mirror of
http://git.nowherejezfoltodf4jiyl6r56jnzintap5vyjlia7fkirfsnfizflqd.onion/nihilist/opsec-blogposts.git
synced 2025-07-02 11:56:40 +00:00
Write article about Telegram's privacy issues
This commit is contained in:
parent
7739e73322
commit
291c63c454
2 changed files with 59 additions and 0 deletions
BIN
telegram/1.png
Normal file
BIN
telegram/1.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 175 KiB |
59
telegram/index.md
Normal file
59
telegram/index.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
author: jorgesumle
|
||||
date: 2025-05-28
|
||||
gitea_url: "http://git.nowherejezfoltodf4jiyl6r56jnzintap5vyjlia7fkirfsnfizflqd.onion/nihilist/blog-contributions/issues/277"
|
||||
xmr: 4AVrC3LT4Ad7DCK5L8MDfWfMeiTqDYJnWDAKGE1jJNbn7pBmFGay81C5sKcci9pwkXRRBexM5JKyVUTEPWvvZTAJ3WeAAex
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Why can't you use Telegram privately
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Telegram dangerously gives some people a false sense of privacy that is
|
||||
in no way warranted. This is mainly due to misleading advertising:
|
||||
Telegram claims to be open source and end-to-end encrypted. Even if
|
||||
these deceptive statements were truth, the popular messaging app has
|
||||
other serious issues that compromise your privacy.
|
||||
|
||||
## Closed-source, centralized and not encrypted: a privacy nightmare
|
||||
|
||||
Only the Telegram client code is open source, but that code is useless
|
||||
without the back-end closed-source programs and infrastructure. Those
|
||||
core components are **controlled by a single company** that can be forced to
|
||||
comply with authorities. In August 2024, Telegram CEO was arrested by
|
||||
French authorities who demanded information on users of the app. He gave
|
||||
in, showing the world that your private conversation, phone number, IP
|
||||
address, pictures and so on are not safe.
|
||||
|
||||
A big problem is that messages on Telegram aren't encrypted by default,
|
||||
so users are an easy prey. They could start a "secret chat", but that
|
||||
feature is not available on desktop or web clients and would surely
|
||||
raise suspicion. The problem with optional privacy is that it makes
|
||||
users who opt out stand out in the crowd.
|
||||
|
||||
## You will be tracked
|
||||
|
||||
Better forget it if you want to be anonymous on Telegram. Before you
|
||||
can even start chatting you must provide a phone number, which can be
|
||||
easily linked to your real identity. The only workaround would be to use
|
||||
a burner phone. Even then, you would have to be technologically savvy to
|
||||
install a privacy-respecting open source mobile operating system and
|
||||
avoid being tracked by cellphone networks. Using a pseudonym and
|
||||
avoiding sharing personal information would be pointless at that point.
|
||||
|
||||
In short, it is practically impossible to use Telegram with privacy or
|
||||
anonymity, so it can only be used for public use. If someone invites you
|
||||
to use Telegram to discuss sensitive topics, refuse. Instead tell them
|
||||
to do it in person or use an open source, decentralized and anonymous
|
||||
alternative such as SimpleX.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why SimpleX
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike Telegram, SimpleX does not require users to provide a phone
|
||||
number. It is designed with strong privacy and security features,
|
||||
ensuring that your messages remain confidential and are not stored on
|
||||
any central server. It offers end-to-end encryption and minimal metadata
|
||||
collection, making it a robust choice for those who prioritize privacy
|
||||
and security in their communications. If you want to achieve secure,
|
||||
decentralized, and privacy-focused communication, SimpleX is a great
|
||||
option.
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue