oxeo0/opsec-blogposts
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of http://git.nowherejezfoltodf4jiyl6r56jnzintap5vyjlia7fkirfsnfizflqd.onion/nihilist/opsec-blogposts.git synced 2025-05-16 19:27:06 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

add article

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
MulliganSecurity 2025-05-14 14:10:45 +02:00
parent c44da1d939
commit 87354302bd
14 changed files with 458 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

BIN
stateistheenemy/anarchist.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 140 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/aynrand.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 187 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/corruption.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 180 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/dictatorship.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 221 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/everywhere.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 174 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/feelthepower.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 282 KiB

458
stateistheenemy/index.html Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,458 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<meta name="description" content="Cloud provider threat model">
<meta name="author" content="MulliganSecurity">
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="../../../../../../assets/img/favicon.png">
<title>Introduction to Anonymous Server Monitoring</title>
<!-- Bootstrap core CSS -->
<link href="../../assets/css/bootstrap.css" rel="stylesheet">
<link href="../../assets/css/xt256.css" rel="stylesheet">
<!-- Custom styles for this template -->
<link href="../../assets/css/main.css" rel="stylesheet">
<!-- HTML5 shim and Respond.js IE8 support of HTML5 elements and media queries -->
<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script src="https://oss.maxcdn.com/libs/html5shiv/3.7.0/html5shiv.js"></script>
<script src="https://oss.maxcdn.com/libs/respond.js/1.3.0/respond.min.js"></script>
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body>
<!-- Static navbar -->
<div class="navbar navbar-inverse-anon navbar-static-top">
<div class="container">
<div class="navbar-header">
<button type="button" class="navbar-toggle" data-toggle="collapse" data-target=".navbar-collapse">
<span class="icon-bar"></span>
<span class="icon-bar"></span>
<span class="icon-bar"></span>
</button>
<a class="navbar-brand-anon" href="\index.html">The Nihilism Blog</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-collapse collapse">
<ul class="nav navbar-nav navbar-right">
<li><a href="/about.html">About</a></li>
<li><a href="/blog.html">Categories</a></li>
<li><a href="https://blog.nowhere.moe/donate.html">Donate</a></li>
<li><a href="/contact.html">Contact</a></li>
</ul>
</div><!--/.nav-collapse -->
</div>
</div>
<!-- +++++ Posts Lists +++++ -->
<!-- +++++ First Post +++++ -->
<div id="anon2">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8 col-lg-offset-2">
<a href="../index.html">Previous Page</a></br></br><p><img src="../../assets/img/mulligan_sec.jpeg" width="50px" height="50px"> <ba>Mulligan Security - 2025-02-07 </a></p>
<p>
<h1><b>Why societies have given birth to the State</b></h1>
The modern, centralized State is an institution that is relatively new when put into historical perspective. For most of human history States had been quite decentralized and uninvolved in the day-to-day of their citizens, mostly content with collecting taxes and waging war on each other or their own citizens. <br><br>
As we will discuss, whatever form the State takes it always end up with a caste, a limited number of families (a political class) sharing dominion over swaths of territory and their inhabitants.
<br><br>
With the modern era and industrialization, information and productivity grew exponentially, allowing states to seize more and more prerogatives and powers, grow ever fatter, powerful and oppressive.
<br><br>
<b>Societies do not give birth to the State.</b> Clans, castes, families believing that their interest can be best served by a monopoly on violence coalesce into a State and are allowed to do so by the rest of their society through the trading of favors in exchange for allegiance.
<br><br>
While it was explicit during the medieval era, today's rituals in democratic countries are very similar in nature:
<ul>
<li> by voting, one gives assent to the policies that will be implemented (culturally shown by the chestnut "if you didn't vote you don't get to complain): as in the medieval era there is no alternative to an allegiance to the current power structure </li>
<li> the same cast of politicians "compete" on a regular basis with very little change in its makeup, with promises that always boil down to "I will take money and status from your opponents and give them to you". This is reframed as "we will subsidize X or Y" or "we will crack down on such and such for the common good"</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div><!-- /row -->
</div> <!-- /container -->
</div><!-- /grey -->
<div id="anon3">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8 col-lg-offset-2">
<p>
<h1><b>How does the state dictate what companies can and can't do</b></h1>
Within a country, the State has two main tools it uses to load the economic dices:
<ul>
<li>its monopoly on violence</li>
<li>its ability to counterfeit currency</li>
</ul>
While the former is the most blatant and spectacular one and is used (in times of peace) sparingly to sow fear and distrust among the people living under a State it is actually the least powerful of the two. <br><br>
By mandating the use of a specific currency in mandatory transactions (such taxes), a State guarantees itself an easy way to steal from its victims through inflation. In order to redistribute the spoils it will embed itself in the economic functions through influence on companies.
<br><br>
This is accomplished in the following way:
<ul>
<li>print money (through actual printing, interest rate manipulation, ...)</li>
<li> use this money to:
<ul>
<li>purchase controlling shares in private companies</li>
<li>subsidize specific companies to help them outcompete their less favored opponents</li>
<li>use violence to keep competitors at bay (with State-mandated monopolies, or by favoring regulatory capture)</li>
</ul>
</li>
For a company to work under a State it must:
<ul>
<li> comply with its rule or be the object of violence</li>
<li>use its allowed legal currency and none other</li>
</ul>
<br><br>
By controlling the currency and being able to counterfeit it at will, together with its monopoly on violence, the State is able to favor or destroy companies independantly of the value they bring to society, very much like a local mom'n pop shop has to comply with the mob demands or face escalating violence.
</div>
</div><!-- /row -->
</div> <!-- /container -->
</div><!-- /grey -->
<div id="anon2">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8 col-lg-offset-2">
<p>
<h1><b>Why Do People Mistakenly Trust the State?</b></h1>
Here’s a valid question: Why do people trust the state? There isn’t just one answer — in fact, there are many reasons, and they deserve to be examined in detail.<br><br>
Let’s start with education. Most people are taught to obey from the moment they're born. They have to obey their parents, their teachers, and other authority figures. Obedience becomes ingrained in our minds, and the state knows this. There's a strange connection, deeply rooted in childhood, between obedience and trust — people tend to trust those they’ve been conditioned to obey, including institutions.<br><br>
This dynamic goes back further than modern democracy. Over time, states have learned how to manipulate populations to appear protective and trustworthy — not necessarily to be these things, but to look like them. The goal? To maintain control and obedience.
<h2><b>Coercion and Manipulation</b></h2>
<center><img src="manipulated.png"/></center>
<br><br>
Now, let’s consider how a state can manipulate its population while maintaining the illusion of being clean, protective, and trustworthy. It’s a clever combination of early indoctrination, providing a false sense of freedom, and controlling the media. <br><br>
For example: if a state allows people to communicate freely (within limits), choose their careers, offers free healthcare, and uses media to highlight only the positive aspects of its decisions while hiding the negative, people will end up trusting the state — even without truly understanding what it's doing behind the scenes.<br><br>
And that’s exactly the point: people often trust something they don’t actually understand. Most major decisions are made without the population ever being informed.<br><br>
Because if you don’t know something is wrong, why wouldn’t you trust it?<br><br>
<h3><b>On the Use of Secrecy</b></h3>
<center><img src="secret.png"/></center>
<br><br>
Take countries like Russia, China, or North Korea — secrecy is extreme, and those who try to expose the truth risk disappearing or spending the rest of their lives in prison. <br><br>
But here’s the uncomfortable truth: this kind of information suppression happens everywhere. The only difference is how it’s presented. Media in the West often paints Russia, China, and North Korea as the vilains — but many other countries use similar tactics behind the scenes.<br><br>
Always remember: when you rely on the media, you only see what they choose to show you. Getting the full picture is a long and difficult journey — one that not everyone is able or willing to take.<br><br>
<h3><b>Media and Narrative Control</b></h3>
<center><img src="media.png"/></center>
<br><br>
Information is power. And controlling it? That’s one of the state's most powerful tools.
<br><br>
Social networks are now a key part of these manipulation tactics used by states. In reality, they’re designed to make you believe you have free speech and that you’re not alone in your beliefs. But the truth is, they only show you what they want you to see.
<br><br>
While it might feel like you have the freedom to express yourself online, the algorithms behind these platforms are carefully crafted to filter and prioritize content that aligns with specific narratives. This creates the illusion of diversity of opinion when, in fact, it's a controlled environment where you're subtly pushed in certain directions, often without even realizing it.
<br><br>
So, while social media gives the appearance of freedom and connection, it's another tool in the state's arsenal to guide thought and reinforce obedience.
<h4><b>A case Study: the last US Presidential election</b></h4>
<center><img src="everywhere.png" /></center>
<br><br>
Let’s take a recent real-life example to illustrate this. In the United States, Elon Musk, the CEO of X (formerly Twitter), decided to support Donald Trump in his campaign. From that moment, we saw a noticeable shift on the platform. Posts highlighting negative aspects of immigration, security concerns, and mistakes made by Joe Biden began to dominate the feed. At the same time, opposing viewpoints started disappearing, slowly but surely.
<br><br>
This is a perfect example of how social media platforms can be manipulated to shape public opinion. By amplifying certain voices and silencing others, the platform is steering the narrative in a direction that aligns with the interests of powerful individuals or political agendas. In this case, the change was so evident that it became almost impossible for users to ignore the bias in the content they were seeing.
<br><br>
What’s important here is not just the content being highlighted, but the way the platform was actively shaping the political conversation — and this was happening right in front of everyone, yet very few seemed to notice how controlled the flow of information had become.
<br><br>
As information is manipulated and states gain the ability to control your fears, they can position themselves as the heroes and saviors that will protect you and make your life better. They exploit these fears, presenting themselves as the only solution to the dangers they’ve helped amplify.
<br><br>
This is a powerful strategy — by controlling the narrative and shaping public perception, states make themselves seem indispensable. People, caught in the grip of fear or uncertainty, start to trust the very institutions that have, in part, created the conditions for their anxiety. It’s a cycle of control: the state stirs up fear, then offers itself as the only way to overcome it.
<br><br>
And this is exactly how trust in the state grows — not because the state is truly benevolent, but because it’s positioned as the only force capable of protecting you from the very threats it has amplified.
<br><br>
In addition, it’s important to highlight that what happened on X didn’t just impact the United States — its effects spread worldwide. Many other countries are seeing radical political parties gaining prominence on the platform. This isn’t just a matter of shifting political opinions; it's leading to a larger ideological evolution among populations.
<br><br>
The algorithms that amplify certain voices don’t just push certain viewpoints in one country — they have a global reach, influencing political landscapes in places where radical ideas are gaining traction. This creates a ripple effect, where ideas that were once considered fringe start to become more normalized. As a result, people everywhere are being exposed to, and sometimes even drawn toward, extreme ideologies.
<br><br>
This goes beyond the United States' borders, showing how powerful social media platforms can shape political discourse and potentially push societies toward more polarized and extreme positions — all under the guise of free speech and open debate.
<br><br>
<h3>Rights and Social Control</h3>
<center><img src="social.png"/></center>
<br><br>
One last reason people trust states is because of the rights they’re granted. When a state gives its population rights, people tend to trust it almost automatically. But this is where things get tricky — because, in reality, this is nonsensical. If a state is "giving" you rights, it also means the state is withholding others.
<br><br>
This is where many state opponents disagree. Why should anyone — or anything — have the power to decide what rights you do or don’t have, without consulting you first? The very concept that a government can grant or take away rights implies a level of control that undermines true freedom. People are led to believe that these "granted" rights are something they should be grateful for, when in fact, the real question is: why should we need permission at all? Why not trust that your inherent rights are yours by birth, not by the state’s approval?
<br><br>
This leads to a dangerous dynamic: trusting a system that has the power to define and limit your rights, while masking this as a benevolent gift. And yet, this is how many people are conditioned to think about their relationship with the state.
<br><br>
In most cases, if you ask a state representative or someone who supports the system, the answer will be the same: rights need to be limited and controlled to ensure the security of the people. They might say something like, "Imagine if anarchy took over, riots would erupt, and you’d all be dead by the next morning!"
<br><br>
This is the typical response used to justify the state's control over individual freedoms. But when you break it down, it’s still just another way to manipulate your fears. The state presents itself as the only entity capable of keeping you safe from chaos, painting a picture of disaster if control is loosened. And with that fear, people begin to trust the state more — not because they see it as a true protector, but because they believe it's the only thing standing between them and anarchy.
<br><br>
This tactic isn’t about security at all; it's about consolidating power and ensuring that trust in the state grows. By amplifying the fear of disorder, they create a need for "protection," which only they can provide. It’s a carefully crafted narrative designed to make people feel powerless and dependent.
</p>
</div>
</div><!-- /row -->
</div> <!-- /container -->
</div><!-- /grey -->
<div id="anon3">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8 col-lg-offset-2">
<p>
<h1><b>Statism: concentration of power in the hands of the few</b></h1>
<center><img src="anarchist.png"/></center>
<br><br>
One of the most dysfunctional aspects of the state is that a small group of individuals hold the majority of the power. This concentration of power often goes unchallenged by the population — but why does it work this way? Why are so many people willing to accept a system where only a few have the real influence?
<br><br>
The answer is actually quite simple: people accept it because they’re used to it in almost every aspect of their lives. From the moment we’re born, we’re conditioned to live in a world where power is concentrated in the hands of a few. Take, for example, when you're a child — all the power is in the hands of your parents. They make the rules, they set the boundaries, and you obey, not because you understand the system, but because you’ve been taught to.
<br><br>
Then, when you enter the workforce, the same dynamic applies. Power is concentrated in management. You’re expected to follow orders, often without questioning them. In the military, the power is held by the officers, and soldiers are expected to carry out commands without hesitation. I could go on with example after example — from schools to religious institutions to corporate hierarchies.
<br><br>
These systems — all designed to concentrate power in the hands of a few — are ingrained into us from a young age. They create a mindset where authority is just part of life. By the time we’re adults, we’ve internalized this structure so deeply that we don’t even question it when it comes to the state. It's simply the way the world works, and most people never stop to think that it might be a system of control, not just organization.
<br><br>
Every aspect of your life is designed to make you accept how the state functions. By the time you’re faced with the state’s concentration of power, you’re already conditioned to accept it as normal.
<br><br>
<center><img src="power.png"/></center>
<h2>Statism: a dysfunctional power dynamic</h2>
<br><br>
Now that we understand why this system works the way it does — and why it's accepted by populations — let's dive into why it shouldn't work like this. At its core, what’s happening is that a small group of people are making decisions about every aspect of your life without even consulting you. This concentration of power isn't just an issue of practicality; it’s a fundamental problem of fairness, autonomy, and personal freedom.
<center><img src="taxes.png"/></center>
<br><br>
Take something as basic as your salary. A portion of your income is taken by taxes to fund services that you may never use or agree with. Imagine having money deducted from your paycheck to pay for a service you don’t even benefit from, or for policies you don’t support. It’s your money, yet you have no say in how it’s allocated.
<br><br>
Now, think about the rise of cryptocurrencies and the freedom they represent. You've spent time and effort mining or investing in a crypto that you believe has value — only for the state to decide, without your input, that the cryptocurrency is no longer valid or legal in your country. Suddenly, the asset you’ve worked for is rendered useless, and your financial choices are dictated by a group of people who don’t have to answer to you.
<br><br>
These are just two examples of how states and centralized authorities have the power to control aspects of your life without even consulting you. And it’s not just about money or assets; it extends to laws, regulations, and freedoms that impact every part of your existence. When a few people have this much control, it undermines the very concept of individual autonomy.
<h2><b>Corruption as an eventual norm instead of punctual anomaly</b></h2>
<br><br>
Having such power concentrated in the hands of a few individuals raises another major issue: corruption. Think about it — it’s far easier to corrupt a small group of people than a large one. When power is spread out, it becomes more difficult to manipulate the system. But when it’s concentrated in the hands of just a few, those few have the ability to shape the rules, laws, and decisions in their favor.
<br><br>
So, when the state’s power is concentrated in the hands of a small elite, what guarantees do you have that they aren't corrupt? What prevents them from using their position for personal gain, to benefit their friends, or to further entrench their own power?
<br><br>
The reality is, the more concentrated the power, the higher the risk of corruption. History is filled with examples where a small group of leaders or officials abused their power — whether for financial gain, to suppress opposition, or to manipulate laws to keep themselves in power. And once corruption takes root, it becomes incredibly difficult to root out.
<br><br>
This is the danger of having a system where decision-making is limited to a few. Without proper checks and balances, and without a system that holds those in power accountable, the risk of corruption grows exponentially.
<br><br>
<center><img src="corruption.png"/></center>
<br><br>
Small groups of people holding most of the power also create a serious issue when it comes to counterpower — the ability to challenge or oppose that power effectively. In a system where power is concentrated in a small group of individuals, it becomes incredibly difficult to form a strong and effective opposition.
<br><br>
For one, those in power can easily stifle dissent. They control the key institutions, the media, and the channels through which opposition voices can be heard. In a system with distributed power, opposition can come from various corners — from civil society, the media, grassroots movements, or even within the system itself (e.g., checks and balances). But when a small elite controls everything, the avenues for meaningful opposition are severely limited.
<br><br>
Think about it: How can an opposition movement succeed if it has to fight against not only the policies but also the very institutions that enforce them? From law enforcement to the judiciary to the media — all these institutions are often under the influence of the powerful few. It’s a situation where the opposition is outgunned, outmanned, and outresourced, making it nearly impossible to challenge the status quo effectively.
<br><br>
This concentration of power silences potential alternatives and ensures that only the voices of those in control are amplified. A healthy, functioning society requires diverse, independent sources of power that can act as checks on each other. But in a system where a small group of people holds the reins, real counterpower becomes just a far-off ideal.
<center><img src="feelthepower.png"/></center>
</p>
</div>
</div><!-- /row -->
</div> <!-- /container -->
</div><!-- /grey -->
<div id="anon2">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8 col-lg-offset-2">
<p>
<h1><b>Democracy: a dictatorship in sheep's clothing</b></h1>
<br><br>
Now that we've discussed how states lie, manipulate, and abuse their power, the big question arises: Are democracies still democracies? If the core principles of democracy are being compromised, can we truly call these systems democratic?
<br><br>
First, let’s take a look at how Wikipedia defines democracy:
<br><br>
"Democracy is a system of government where the citizens exercise power by voting. In a direct democracy, the people decide on policies directly, whereas in a representative democracy, the people elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf."
<br><br>
On the surface, this definition sounds ideal — people having the power to make decisions or elect those who represent their interests. But when you dig deeper into the functioning of modern states, especially in systems that claim to be democracies, we begin to question whether the reality matches the ideal.
<br><br>
If a small group of elites are making the key decisions and manipulating public opinion through media and social networks, can we still say the people truly have power? Are elections even fair if they are influenced by money, media, and algorithms designed to sway voters? Can we call a system democratic when the voices of the majority are drowned out by the interests of a few?
<br><br>
<center><img src="tyranny.png"/></center>
There’s one main aspect that should convince you that democracies, as we once understood them, are over. If you look at who people are actually voting for, you’ll start to realize that they’re not choosing real representatives from the population — they’re choosing people who have been specifically trained to be politicians.
<br><br>
In many cases, those running for office aren’t necessarily the ones who understand the struggles of the average citizen or who have lived the same experiences as most voters. Instead, they’re individuals groomed for politics, often with backgrounds in law, business, or elite institutions — far removed from the day-to-day realities of most people. They’re trained in the art of rhetoric, strategy, and persuasion, but not in the genuine representation of public interest.
<br><br>
This creates a significant disconnect between the people and the politicians. When you have a system where only a select group is prepared to lead — and that group is more skilled at political maneuvering than actual governance for the people — you have to question whether the system is still democratic at all.
<br><br>
It’s no longer about ordinary citizens running for office because they genuinely want to make a difference; it’s about selecting from a pool of professional politicians who are often disconnected from the needs and concerns of the population they’re supposed to represent. The political system becomes more of a career path than a genuine service to the people.
<br><br>
Now, think about it: All these politicians, despite their supposed "political orientations," have been trained in the same way, by the same institutions, and with the same ultimate goal. They’re not really opposed to each other — they’re just acting.
<br><br>
If you look closely, you’ll realize that most of them are friends. They eat together, socialize, and even text each other all day long. The political drama that we see on TV, the speeches, the debates — it’s all part of a carefully crafted performance. It’s not about real opposition or ideological differences anymore.
<br><br>
In fact, ideas and personal convictions have become secondary in the world of politics. What matters is winning. And to win, politicians are trained in how to market themselves, how to present the right image, how to manipulate the public into believing they are the right choice. Their job isn’t to genuinely represent the people or to put forward a set of principles — it’s to play the game, secure votes, and stay in power.
<br><br>
This is why, despite their different labels — liberal, conservative, progressive, etc. — they often end up serving the same interests, passing similar laws, and supporting the same systems of power. The lines between them blur, because at the end of the day, they’re not really on different sides; they’re all part of the same elite political network, doing what they’re trained to do.
<br><br>
<center><img src="aynrand.png"/></center>
<h2><b>An honest look at dictatorship</b></h2>
Now that we've discussed what a democracy is, let’s take a look at how Wikipedia defines dictatorship:
<br><br>
"A dictatorship is a form of government in which one person or a small group possesses absolute power without effective constitutional limitations. Dictatorships are often characterized by the concentration of power, suppression of political opposition, and the absence of democratic processes such as free elections."
<br><br>
At first glance, this sounds like a system where a single individual or a small group holds unchecked power. But when you look closely, it begins to sound eerily familiar, doesn't it? The concentration of power, suppression of real opposition, and a lack of genuine democratic processes — it starts to seem like many so-called "democracies" today are operating under principles very similar to those of a dictatorship.
<br><br>
The funny part is that most of these "democracies" are openly fighting dictatorships, condemning them for exactly what they themselves are secretly doing behind closed doors.
<br><br>
These nations, which claim to uphold democratic values, often position themselves as the defenders of freedom and human rights, rallying against authoritarian regimes. Yet, in reality, they exhibit many of the same practices — the concentration of power, the suppression of dissent, the manipulation of information. They call out dictatorships for curbing free speech and stifling opposition, but at the same time, they’re doing much of the same, just in a more subtle or disguised way.
<br><br>
It’s a classic case of "do as I say, not as I do." While publicly criticizing authoritarian regimes for their lack of political freedoms, they maintain systems that essentially limit true democratic choice and concentrate power in the hands of a few elites. In fact, by doing so, they may be more insidious than overt dictatorships, as their control is masked behind the facade of democracy.
<br><br>
<center><img src="dictatorship.png"/></center>
</p>
</div>
</div><!-- /row -->
</div> <!-- /container -->
</div><!-- /grey -->
<div id="anon3">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8 col-lg-offset-2">
</div>
</div><!-- /row -->
</div> <!-- /container -->
</div><!-- /grey -->
<!-- +++++ Footer Section +++++ -->
<div id="anonb">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-4">
<h4>Nihilism</h4>
<p>
Until there is Nothing left.</p></br></br><p>Creative Commons Zero: <a href="../../../../opsec/runtheblog/index.html">No Rights Reserved</a></br><img src="\CC0.png">
</p>
</div><!-- /col-lg-4 -->
<div class="col-lg-4">
<h4>My Links</h4>
<p>
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://blog.nowhere.moe/rss/feed.xml">RSS Feed</a><br/><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://simplex.chat/contact#/?v=2-7&smp=smp%3A%2F%2FL5jrGV2L_Bb20Oj0aE4Gn-m5AHet9XdpYDotiqpcpGc%3D%40nowhere.moe%2FH4g7zPbitSLV5tDQ51Yz-R6RgOkMEeCc%23%2F%3Fv%3D1-3%26dh%3DMCowBQYDK2VuAyEAkts5T5AMxHGrZCCg12aeKxWcpXaxbB_XqjrXmcFYlDQ%253D&data=%7B%22type%22%3A%22group%22%2C%22groupLinkId%22%3A%22c3Y-iDaoDCFm6RhptSDOaw%3D%3D%22%7D">SimpleX Chat</a><br/>
</p>
</div><!-- /col-lg-4 -->
<div class="col-lg-4">
<h4>About Mulligan Security</h4>
<p style="word-wrap: break-word;"><u>Donate XMR:</u><br>86NCojqYmjwim4NGZzaoLS2ozbLkMaQTnd3VVa9MdW1jVpQbseigSfiCqYGrM1c5rmZ173mrp8RmvPsvspG8jGr99yK3PSs</p></br><p><u>Contact:</u> mulligansecurity@riseup.net <br><a href="http://msec2nnqtbwh5c5yxpiswzwnqperok5k33udj7t6wmqcleu3ifj34sqd.onion">website</a><br><a href="https://simplex.chat/contact#/?v=2-7&smp=smp%3A%2F%2FiZJOs1BYKxD2nEndBtacHlBP-bNKv3gywICYPZZjXXE%3D%40chatnedvznvcnsovrm3e6jrgt6pkpai5i3rgslrrxlnv352ardboebid.onion%2FtT5R0tQWBzJPAkjvH-wai4PnpfTor89R%23%2F%3Fv%3D1-3%26dh%3DMCowBQYDK2VuAyEA_7oNMJAjBrt210CSc2LEIZJh5BFizPx7JUYFCmj8p1k%253D">SimpleX</a></p>
</div><!-- /col-lg-4 -->
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Bootstrap core JavaScript
================================================== -->
<!-- Placed at the end of the document so the pages load faster -->
</body>
</html>

BIN
stateistheenemy/manipulated.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 186 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/media.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 144 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/power.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 226 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/secret.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 358 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/social.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 466 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/taxes.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 198 KiB

BIN
stateistheenemy/tyranny.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 263 KiB