mirror of
http://git.nowherejezfoltodf4jiyl6r56jnzintap5vyjlia7fkirfsnfizflqd.onion/nihilist/opsec-blogposts.git
synced 2025-05-17 12:47:09 +00:00
deniable identity -> anonymous identity
This commit is contained in:
parent
6976cb577d
commit
c2a87b300b
3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -117,12 +117,12 @@ US national security leaders have been found to use Signal to [discuss military
|
|||
|
||||
## What makes SimpleX Chat better?
|
||||
|
||||
### Deniable Chats
|
||||
### Anonymous Chats
|
||||
|
||||
SimpleX supports [deniable chats](../opsec/chats/index.md#deniable-chat-example) which allow users to plausibly deny their participation in a conversation by using one-time nickname for each conversation.
|
||||
SimpleX supports [anonymous chats](../opsec/chats/index.md#anonymous-chat-example) which allow users to plausibly deny their participation in a conversation by using one-time nickname for each conversation.
|
||||
This reduces the risk of being linked to specific messages or conversations.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
There's no such feature in Signal. Usernames can be changed at any time, but they change in each conversation user is a part of.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -160,4 +160,4 @@ There is no client CAPTCHA mechanism that would hurt usability without exposing
|
|||
While both Signal and SimpleX Chat are good secure open-source messaging apps, for our use-case SimpleX Chat offers the best balance between security, [privacy, anonymity and deniability](../opsec/aps/index.md) and usability.
|
||||
|
||||
Signal on the other hand only provides security and partial privacy (you're private from your contacts if you use Usernames feature).
|
||||
It is clearly focused more on usability and user-friendliness. That's what made the app so popular amongst less tech-savvy users.
|
||||
It is clearly focused more on usability and user-friendliness. That's what made the app so popular amongst less tech-savvy users.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue